![]() |
Materials available for International Evaluation Panel members |
This page is jointly created and kept by CTU management and Academic senate in order to provide transparent and complete information about the evaluation process, both ouside to the Ministery of Education, Youth and Sports and inside to CTU Academic Community. Materials have been collected and organized by Václav Hlaváč (CTU Academic Senate member; He chairs KRK commission)) and Zbyněk Škvor (CTU vice-rector).
After investing a lot of efforts into evaluation process, we can learn a lot from this independent feedback. Can we afford to miss this oportunity?
Final report by the International Evaluation Panel from 2020-12-28.
Final report by the International Evaluation Panel from 2021-02-12 (corrected minor formal problems based on a request from Ministry of Education).
Citation Analysis of Scientific Publications of Czech Universities (2000–2019)
The overall evaluation of the university has not been finished/confirmed by the Ministry of Education.
# | CTU part | Overall assessment | Self-evaluation | Presentations | Additional information |
0 | Cover page | N/A | 00TitlePage.pdf | N/A | --- |
1 | Faculty of Civil Engineering | 5 - Excellent | 01M3-FSv.pdf | F1-FSv | FCE comments |
2 | Faculty of Mechanical Engineering | 5 - Excellent | 02M3-FS.pdf | F2-FS | FME comments |
3 | Faculty of Electrical Engineering | 5 - Excellent | 03M3-FEL.pdf | F3-FEL; Quartiles IF Journal papers | FEE comments |
4 | Faculty of Nuclear and Physical Engineering | 5 - Excellent | 04M3-FJFI.pdf | Presentation | FNSPE comments |
5 | Faculty of Architecture | 4 - Very good | 05M3-FA.pdf | Presentation | FA comments |
6 | Faculty of Transportation Sciences | 4 - Very good | 06M3-FD.pdf | F6-FD | FTS comments |
7 | Faculty of Biomedical Engineering | 4 - Very good | 07M3-FBMI.pdf | F7-FBMI | FBME comments |
8 | Faculty of Information Technologies | 3- Good | 08M3-FIT.pdf | F8-FIT | FIT comments |
9 | Klokner Institute | 3- Good | 09M3-KU.pdf | KU | Klokner Institute comments |
10 | Masaryk Institute | 1 - Below awerage | 10M3-MUVS.pdf | MU (addendum) | MIAS comments |
11 | UCEEB | 4 - Very good | 11M3-UCEEB.pdf | Presentation | --- |
12 | CIIRC | 5 - Excellent | 12M3 CIIRC.pdf | CIIRC | CIIRC comments |
13 | UTEF | 4 - Very good | 13M3-UTEF.pdf | IEAP | IEAP comments |
14 | CTU as a whole | module 4: 5 - Excellent module 5: 5 - Excellent |
14WholeCTU-M4-M5.pdf Self-Evaluation report in modules 4 and 5 | CTU H2020 Funding analysis | Rector´s Comments |
15 | CTU as a whole | N/A | 15SWOT-CTU.pdf CTU SWOT analysis | Impact factor and citation analysis 2017-2019 | --- |
16 | CTU as a whole | N/A | 16Supplement2SER-form-1.pdf Supplement 2 to the self-evaluation report | CTU Research highlights; CTU Yesterday, Today, Tommorow | --- |